蒙特卡洛法在气压传感器检定结果不确定度评定中的应用
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

天津市气象探测中心 天津 300061

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TN06

基金项目:


Application of Monte Carlo method in uncertainty evaluation of air pressure sensors verification results
Author:
Affiliation:

Tianjin Meteorological Observation Center, Tianjin 300061, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    GUM法是评定测量不确定度的一般方法,以传播不确定度的方式提供输出量的包含区间,在线性模型条件下能够提供较为准确的评定结果,气象仪器检定结果的不确定度评定也采用GUM法进行。然而,当测量模型和计算较为复杂时,GUM法得到的结果可能出现较大的偏差。蒙特卡洛方法(MCM)以传播概率分布的方式,为测量不确定度的评定提供了一种通用的数值方法。以气压传感器检定结果为例,运用MCM进行不确定度评定,并用MCM评定结果验证了GUM法评定结果的准确性。结果表明,GUM法评定结果未能通过验证,说明GUM法在气压传感器检定结果的不确定度评定方面可能存在一定的问题,而用MCM可以得到更为准确可靠的包含区间。

    Abstract:

    GUM is a common method for uncertainty evaluation. Inclusion intervals are calculated by propagating uncertainty with GUM, which can get accurate evaluation results. Uncertainties of meteorological instruments verification results are also evaluated by GUM. However, GUM results may appear deviation when measurement model and calculations are complex. Monte Carlo Method (MCM) provides a general numerical method for uncertainty evaluations by propagating probability distribution. Take verification results of air pressure sensors as examples, uncertainty was evaluated by MCM and GUM results were verificated. Results showed that GUM results did not pass the verification. There are some problems in evaluating air pressure uncertainty with GUM. A more accurate inclusion interval can be calculated by MCM.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李文博,杨波,颜平江.蒙特卡洛法在气压传感器检定结果不确定度评定中的应用[J].国外电子测量技术,2016,35(8):90-93

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-10-09
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码